Custom BIONICLE Wiki
Advertisement
Forums: Index > Matoran Council Chamber > Subcategory for wikis

This forum has been closed.
This voting has failed to reach a 3-2 majority, and the topic is no longer open for discussion on these forums. If you disagree with this decision, please create another forum page on the matter, but only after an adequate amount of time has passed.


Hello everyone, I have noticed a new trend lately; some articles that are well-written simply can't live up to the MoS, because ours was designed within the bounds of what we've come across in Bionicle. Some articles don't have an history, or a personality, let alone a mask. Some have details about their buils, armanent and size. I think we should make a new template, so these articles can bypass the MoS and stay on this site. I think we should, because we shouldn't let anyone be hindered in adding their fiction, should it be well-written. Therefore, I'd suggest a template that only admins and b'crats may hand out, to protect special articles from deletion, simply because they're out off the bounds of the MoS. I also don't want to change the MoS itself, since that would require far more work. Please vote and comment below.

Reaper of Souls 20:01, November 10, 2011 (UTC)


Yes, allow a special class of articles to exist.[]

1. Reaper of Souls 20:01, November 10, 2011 (UTC)


No, the articles have to meet the standards set in the MoS, just like everyone else.[]

  1. Sorry SA, but, I respectively disagree. I think any article that doesn't follow the MoS should have the template added to the page and given a month before deletion. It's much more organized that way. —Jman98's Sig ImageJamn liciousness 20:04, November 10, 2011 (UTC)
  2. If the page is well-written, there's no reason it shouldn't meet the MoS in the first place. Shadowmaster (Contribs) 23:45, November 10, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Sorry, man going to have agree with SM. --TDG.gif (Talk) 06:36, November 12, 2011 (UTC)
  4. I'm not an admin, but I still think that this shoudn't be changed. CombatRoboticPrototype11 03:53, November 15, 2011 (UTC)

Comments[]

Advertisement